1. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
U0gZf5;* 你是否同意或不同意以下聲明？家長是最好的老師。使用具體原因和例子來支持你的答案。
F+"_] y];-D>jk Obviously, the earliest teachers we have in our lives in most cases are our parents, and they are generally the most involved in the development and education of their children. Yet neither are all parents good teachers nor are those good parents the best teachers.
NV7k@7_{B 顯然，我們最早的老師，在大多數情況下，我們的生活是我們的父母，他們是最普遍的發展和子女教育工作。然而，也不是所有家長好老師，也不是那些好父母最好的老師。
fuzB;Ea [Ur\^wS First of all, not all parents are good teachers. As normal individuals, some parents more or less have bad habits. Even though parents almost instinctively devote themselves to cultivating their offspring, the outcome might turn out to be disappointment, for all children tend to unconsciously or subconsciously copy every thing from their parents. Another deficiency of parents as teachers is the fact that most parents are lack of common senses of education. All too often we observe some parents tend to pursue their cherished but failed dream by forcing their children to develop in a prearranged direction. Ironically, if their children did not follow the instructions, the children would be regarded as disobedient or allegedly rebellious. In fact, it is parents rather than their children that virtually disobey common senses.
OvAh p&k 首先，并非所有家長都好老師。作為正常人，一些家長或多或少有壞習慣。盡管父母幾乎本能地致力于培養他們的后代，其結果可能會變成失望而歸，往往所有兒童都能自覺或不自覺從他們的父母復制每一件事。另一個家長缺乏的是，大部分家長對教育的共同感覺，缺乏教師。我們常�？吹揭恍└改竿非螅仁蛊渥优陬A先安排的發展方向，他們所珍惜的，但未能夢想。具有諷刺意味的，如果子女沒有遵循指示，孩子就被視為不聽話或據稱反叛。事實上，這是家長，而不是他們的孩子，
v\GVy[Qyv 8l_M 0F , Moreover, some parents are qualified as good teachers, but not all of them are the best ones. When children are in the preliminary school, it is not surprising that parents are capable of teaching their children almost every subject even better than professional teachers in the school. But the situation will not last long. We live in a world where knowledge is accumulated by multiplying and at the same time becomes more and more specialized. Therefore, to be a professional in a certain field today takes much longer time than ever before. No parent is able to be professional in all fields, though they might be experts in one or more fields. Wise parents often release rather than charge their children as early as possible. They are aware of the possibility outside the family.
ki? h7 此外，一些家長有資格好老師，但不是所有這些都是最好的。當他們在初步學校的，這并不奇怪，父母是孩子的教學，幾乎每一個問題甚至比在學校專業教師做得更好。但情況不會持續太久。我們在那里知識的增多，同時積累了生活的世界變得越來越專業化。因此，是在某一領域的專業今日需時較長的時間比以往任何時候。家長們能在所有領域的專業，雖然他們可能在一個或多個領域的專家。明智的家長往往釋放，而不是他們的孩子負責盡早。他們都明白了家庭以外的可能性。
MjU|XQS: d2V X\ Parents may, nevertheless, help their children much more than do good teachers. Most parts of children education are virtually beyond teachers' reaches. It is parents that supplement. Psychology studies have shown us that parents' love sometimes has astonishingly magic power to their children. Albert Einstein's mother and Forest Gump's mother are both good examples. On the other hand, parents might do their children harm more than do bad teachers as well. The natures of those children whose parents have divorced are often severely distorted. In a word, it is rather superficial to simply say that parents are the best teachers.
[% C ,&h5 家長仍可以幫助他們的孩子更比好老師。大部分地區的兒童教育幾乎超出教師達到。這是家長的補充。心理學研究告訴我們，父母的愛，有時有驚人的神奇力量給子女。愛因斯坦的母親和阿甘正傳的母親都是很好的例子。另一方面，家長可以做他們的孩子受到傷害比也差的教師。那些其父母已離婚兒童的性質往往嚴重扭曲�？傊�，這是十分膚淺的簡單地說，家長是最好的老師。
+? h}e gs5(~YiT6 [404 words]
TjyL])$ W7^[W. 2. It has been said, "Not everything that is learned is contained in books." Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?
0?<#! 有人說，“并不是所有的教訓是在書本中。”比較和對比中取得的經驗與知識，從書本上獲得的經驗。在您看來，這是更重要的來源？為什么？
Lm
TFvZ = 5q<_as Both experiences and books are very essential resources, and both of them have relevant merits.
v d
{QFJ 雙方的經驗和書籍是非常重要的資源，他們都有相關的優點。
-}#HaL#'K LWyr
Experiences are the most direct resources we ever have. Almost our every basic skill came from experiences, such as walking, articulating, reading even thinking. Without experiences, some natural born abilities even might lose. Studies have shown that a baby who was robbed by animals into forest for 12 years lost his ability to talk in human language. Furthermore, it is generally accepted that each and every skill develops by experiences, and that's why people always say practice makes perfect.
Ttt'X<9 經驗是最直接的資源的時候都完備。幾乎我們每個基本技能來自經驗，如散步，闡明，閱讀甚至思維。如果沒有經驗，有些天生的能力，甚至可能會喪失。研究表明，嬰兒誰是動物搶劫到12年，森林失去了說話的能力，在人類語言。此外，人們普遍認為，每一個技術發展的經驗，這就是為什么人們總是說熟能生巧。
eXW|{asx 5~|{ :29X Books are valuable when knowledge is beyond the scope of our experiences. Perhaps the most obvious examples are those fluent writers. They write various stories, the scopes of which are far beyond any individual's experiences. Take Joyce Carol Oates for example, her productivity has been prodigious, accumulating in less than two decades to nearly thirty titles, including novels, collections of short stories and verse, plays and literary criticism. Although some of them appear to come from her own direct observations, her dreams, and her fears, much more is clearly from the experiences of others. Her fictive world remains strikingly akin to that real one reflected in the daily newspapers, the television news and talk shows, and the popular magazines of our day.
X H-_tv
B 書是有價值的當知識超出了我們的經驗范圍。或許最明顯的例子是那些流利的作家。他們寫遠遠超過任何個人的經歷的各種故事，其中的范圍中。為例喬伊斯卡羅爾歐茨，她已經驚人的生產力，積累了不到20年的近30冠軍，其中包括小說，短篇故事和詩歌，戲劇和文學批評的集合。雖然其中一些看起來是來自她自己的直接觀察，她的夢想，她的恐懼，更是清楚地從別人的經驗。她虛構的世界仍然驚人地類似，真正的一個反映在報紙，電視新聞和訪談節目，和我們時代的流行雜志。
t:2v`uk Ax;=Zh<DAv Yet either experiences or books may give us wrong information. Our direct observations always are subject to our beliefs, hopes, fears, expectations, and our bias, which might make observations unreliable. People vary in their powers of observation, and the reliability of our observations is no better than the reliability of our memories, which as we know can be deceptive. Information printed in papers sometimes is unreliable either, it may be misprinted, or even deliberately distorted. For example, Definitions such as Marxism, Capitalism, Zionism are totally different in the Oxford Learner's Dictionary of Current English between the original edition and the sanctioned Russian edition.
}d<R
亚洲国产精品va在线观看麻豆
