一.名詞解釋
v$w}UC%uf 非歧視原則.CFR.單證嚴格相符原則.特別提款權.單獨海損.關稅減讓原則.原產地規則.
;8dffsyq 注冊資本
U^7bj 二.論述題
C ocw%Yl 1.試述國際經濟法的調整對象與法律特征
~KYzEqy 2.簡述國際經濟法的主要法律淵源,并請舉例說明之
vhAgX0k 3.如何理解國際貨物買賣中的權利擔保原則
"qd|!:bE 4.試述投資保護協定的法律含義與主要內容
<
oV[[wl 三.案例題(中文回答)
qw
?(^uZNW INTRODUCTION
~LZrhwVj$ Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must
<U1T_fiBoc answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles
T&+3Xi: of international trade law to support your argument
GqR
|hg 'Grii, Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American
&)gc{(4$ company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD
6h2keyod 1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese
JJ%@m;~ company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market
[P =P8-5 has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed
nq8XVT.m^\ back an acceptance.
kLF`6ZXtd ;?tH8jf> Questions:
}7(+#ISK6 1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per
l`ZL^uT ton to USD 2,500 per ton?
e15yDwvB 2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese
c:u*-lYmK% company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer?
&1yJrj9y z k/`Uz Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B
(${ #l (an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity
n:OXv}pv ,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between
Ux*xz|^ them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked
Sx'oa$J B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter
"aF2:E' was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication.
v_EgY2l( So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on
vJ}WNvncVF .So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the
ch]Qz[d goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was
i0K 2#}=^ under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a
5z,q~CU formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of
\-pwA j? China and international practice
g;'S5w9S [|oG}'Xz Questions:
q"<=^vi 1)What is the main issue in this case?
QUn!&55 2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve
jq%亚洲国产精品va在线观看麻豆