選博士導師與選未來——好的信息，大家共勉

李召敏——考博之道 jUl_ToX  
Y<kz+d,C  
在科學界，很多人（包括以前的我）認為只要做好科研，就能成功。很多導師不知是不懂或是愚民，對學生說只要你好好做科研，你就能得到你想要的東西。的確，沒有good science，就可能沒有good future；但是有了good science，走錯了路，還是一樣沒有good future。這就是Peter J. Feibelman寫的A PhD is Not Enough: A Guide to Survival in Science一書的精髓。 Wd+G)Mu_=  
+'iqGg-  
面對這種情況，很多人采取達爾文“適者生存”學說，認為不必教學生這種生存技能和politics，好的學生自然能脫穎而出，但是作者認為這恰恰浪費了社會資源，應該給學生講述這種politics。 6d6Dk>(V  
3-6M
GL9  
博士后是取得博士學位以后的重要學術經歷。對于想成為博士后的博士，首先得問自己：What do I want after going through this? Am I serious? 登山何必扛著船？做博士后的目的就是為了在出站后以科研作為職業的，也就是說要以教授、研究員作為目標崗位的。如果博士的本來想法是要去工業界或者經商，那么就沒有必要浪費時間了。 kOdpW  
Y2tBFeWY  
對于想做博士后的人來說，選擇導師有很大的關系。A PhD is Not Enough: A Guide to Survival in Science一書說："Making a mistake in choosing your advisor can mean years of frustration."該書說，選有名的老教授有兩個好處：一是有名的老教授有廣泛的網絡，并且處于學術網絡里面的都是名人；二是功成名就的老教授不怕你超過他，不怕你和他競爭，相反會以你成為教授而感到光榮，把你當作他的學術產品。"An advisor who has made his mark views the accomplishments of his students with pride, even joy. They are his research 'children.' Thus, other things being equal, an established professor is a superior choice for an advisor."相反，"A young advisor, trying to make his way in the world, does not want to be shown up by his student or postdoc. He has a lot to prove, and is unlikely to be generous with credit for ideas or progress. wtf亚洲国产精品va在线观看麻豆