獻給考博人:當審稿人拿起文章的時候，總體印象起了很大的作用。審稿人的心理定勢就是判斷“過”還是“不過”，沒有第三種選擇。如果他的印象是“不過”，就反復找理由挑毛病。所以要想通過，首先要寫得好，讓審稿人挑不出毛病。而如何寫得好？很多細節導師是不會傳授的。悟性非常重要！以前的碩士生導師的科技英語寫作水平非常好，有時候她修改別人的文章后，會把修改文章的思路和文章的寫法傳授給我。后來讀博士的時候，導師的寫作水平就更棒了，他雖然沒有條條框框地指導，但是從反復修改文章的紅筆文字中，我也悟到了很多�，F在我來分享一些我體會出來的別人很少傳授的寫作細節。
ya~;Of 5 au50%sA~
1）寫作的時候一般不要描述發現科學事實的曲折故事�？梢詫懳覀兪軇e人某個工作的啟發發現了我們的東西，然是不要說：“我們首先叫某個學生去做，沒有做出來。后來我們親自改進了方法，終于做出來了。”不要說：“為了確定這個物質，我們查閱了大量書籍，從來沒有報道過。于是我們到圖書館找了其它文獻，發現了歸屬�！辈灰凳尽皼]有功勞也有苦勞”，而要直奔主題。
D^%IFwU^ s1cu5eCt 這個要點也許顯而易見，但是其實不然。在讀文章的時候經�？梢钥吹竭@樣的不妥當的說法。我以前讀博士第一次做報告的時候，最后一張薄膜是一堆雜志的封面。我對聽眾說，為了做這個年度考核報告，為了做我的科研，我看了這些雜志三百篇文獻。會后，導師對我說：“不要讓別人看到你的汗水，要用科學結果來吸引別人。即使你繞了很大彎子得到最后的結果，你也要輕松地講，讓別人感到你很聰明。”
l59\Lo: sNpA!!\PM Qm3F=*)d 6ZHeAb]" 根據How to Write a Successful Science Thesis (Wiley-VCH)一書p. 98, "Experimental work is by definition a journey into the unknown, fraught with detours and dead ends, but all such obstacles are basically irrelevant from a scientific standpoint. Look upon your dissertation--as you would any other research report--not as a memoir documenting and explaining your every activity, but instead as a proclamation of a set of new insights. How you achieved your results may perhaps play some role in your mentor's appraisal of your efforts, but otherwise it will be of interest only to the extent that certain intimate details may be critical from a methodological standpoint."
3^
UoK MCibYv c[ 2）少用陳詞濫調。很多很多所謂寫作秘訣的網上資料都提供一些句法，但是其實很多都是陳詞濫調，不提供任何信息，可以高度精簡。以下是我給一篇文章審稿的片斷意見："[7] Another reason on why this paper is long and somewhat distracting is that you frequently use words such as "It was found that" (p. 2), "It is worth noting that…" (p. 7), "It was observed that …" (p. 8), "It was observed that…" (p. 9), "It was noted that…" (p. 12), "We observed that…" (of course, it's you who make the observation!), "It was noticed that" (p. 13), "It was interesting to see that…", "It was observed that…", "It was concluded that" (p. 15), "It was found that (p. 17)".”
b?`2LAg n B$2GEg]Ri亚洲国产精品va在线观看麻豆
